Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/popstali/public_html/blog/index.php:2) in /home/popstali/public_html/blog/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 9 Comments on: NY Times Owner Talks About the Future of Their Print Division
http://blog.popstalin.com/articles/business/ny-times-owner-talks-about-the-future-of-their-print-division
The Pop Stalin Design ManifestoTue, 21 Apr 2009 01:04:24 +0000http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2hourly1By: Pop Stalin
http://blog.popstalin.com/articles/business/ny-times-owner-talks-about-the-future-of-their-print-division#comment-138
Pop StalinThu, 08 Feb 2007 16:24:18 +0000http://blog.popstalin.com/?p=61#comment-138Plus, as the article points out, subscription to the print edition is going down and the Internet is going up. So it seems it's also about demand.
One really positive point about all this is the environmental impact it would have.Plus, as the article points out, subscription to the print edition is going down and the Internet is going up. So it seems it’s also about demand.
One really positive point about all this is the environmental impact it would have.
]]>By: Sommer
http://blog.popstalin.com/articles/business/ny-times-owner-talks-about-the-future-of-their-print-division#comment-137
SommerThu, 08 Feb 2007 16:18:08 +0000http://blog.popstalin.com/?p=61#comment-137As much as I love what the Internet has done for communications... I might have the be the old stodger here and protest the thought that The Times might not print anymore in 5 years. I love the smell of newsprint in the morning!
But how much longer can the prohibitive costs of printing a huge daily newspaper be justified? The Catch-22 of our time.As much as I love what the Internet has done for communications… I might have the be the old stodger here and protest the thought that The Times might not print anymore in 5 years. I love the smell of newsprint in the morning!
But how much longer can the prohibitive costs of printing a huge daily newspaper be justified? The Catch-22 of our time.