I was recently checking out the logo galleries over at Logo Pond and thought I’d post some logos I think are well done and that I like. You may notice that none of these logos are “Web 2.0-style” logos (well, one could fall into that category but I think the line is close). I think too often we get wrapped up in the popular style of the moment so I wanted to highlight some logos that do not fall in that category. I hope you enjoy them.
Cafe Journey by emol
Talkonomics by dache
Winston Audio by Chris Rushing
Selma RR Days by Logomotive
Birds Choice by KGB
Persiel Design by Jan Persiel
5 People Have Bloviated
David Airey | Mar 2
What a great idea for a blog post!
You’ve included some nice examples Jen. Personally I think the Winston Audio logo is too illegible. It takes a close look to actually make out what it says. Not ideal for a fleeting glance.
Which of the six falls into your ‘borderline’ web 2.0 bracket?
Pop Stalin | Mar 2
I think Talkonomics skirts on the edge of or could be considered Web 2.0.
As far as the Winston Audio logo, it works great for what it’s for, which is a band. You’ve got to admit, right or wrong, most band logos fall into the illegible category.
Steve Tucker | Mar 4
I really quite like talkonomics; not necessarily the shape or style of the logo, but the colour scheme within the speech bubble. I also REALLY like the railroad days- I only wish I could design like that…
David Pache | Apr 13
Glad you like :^)
Yury, logo design maniac | Oct 3
Bird’s Choice reminds me of 70’s design style.
As for me, my personal favorite at logopond is this one: http://logopond.com/gallery/detail/9605