And you’re right about political candidates and Apple products. One other you left out though is IE vs. FF.
Just because I pointed out this foible doesn’t mean I’m trying to put down your candidate. I’m just pointing out something that eventually, someone else will point out and probably won’t write about it from a design viewpoint.
]]>The Disney subliminal design treatments were done specifically for the reason of appealing to the sense of inner-sexuality in order to sell (which in and of itself is misguided and rather sad). Disney is also famous for sneaking in sexual messages within their animations .. but this is a process that involves many hours, many animators and thus, occasionally you see animators attempting to rebel against their overbearing management without sacrificing a paycheck.
Please think these things through before you start posting them .. you really only make yourself look silly.
]]>Regarding Francis’ comment: There are a couple things that you can’t write about online with out the devoted getting mad, that includes political candidates and Apple products.
]]>That’s like saying whomever noticed the penis of the original “Little Mermaid” design didn’t really see it. That’s why the company reprinted all the materials that it was incorporated in. Sometimes designers hide things in their work. Did the person who designed this do the same? Were you the designer?
]]>